Knowledge and Attitudes about the Flu Vaccine among Pregnant Women in the Valencian Community (Spain).
Identifieur interne : 000027 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000026; suivant : 000028Knowledge and Attitudes about the Flu Vaccine among Pregnant Women in the Valencian Community (Spain).
Auteurs : Noelia Rodríguez-Blanco [Espagne] ; José Tuells [Espagne]Source :
- Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) [ 1648-9144 ] ; 2019.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- psychologie : Femmes enceintes, Vaccination.
- usage thérapeutique : Vaccins antigrippaux.
- Adulte, Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé, Espagne, Femelle, Grossesse, Humains, Études prospectives, Études transversales.
- Wicri :
- geographic : Espagne.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , therapeutic use : Influenza Vaccines.
- geographic : Spain.
- psychology : Pregnant Women, Vaccination.
- Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: To describe the knowledge and attitudes related to the acceptance of the flu vaccine during pregnancy in women, from two Health Departments of the Valencian Community (VC), during the 2015-2016 season, after receiving prenatal care. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted during the annual vaccine season of women ascribed to prenatal care. A midwife offered flu vaccine advice and afterwards conducted a telephone poll of a representative sample, in order to find out the reason for accepting or rejecting the vaccine. Results: Of the 1017 expectant women who received advice about the vaccine, 77.4% (95% CI: 74.8-79.9%) declared their intention to vaccinate. After the recommendation, the vaccine coverage was 61.6%, with a percentage of accordance of 98.8% (95% CI: 98.0-99.6%) between the coverage declared and the Nominal Vaccination Registry (NVR) of the VC. Additionally, 67.2% of the expectant women were interviewed (n = 683). Most were aware of the recommendation and identified the health center and the midwife as the main sources of information. The internet was a consistent source in favor of vaccination 80.8% (n = 42). The obstetric variables (risk during the pregnancy, end of pregnancy, and feeding the newborn) did not have a statistically significant relationship with the vaccination. The women declared a high adherence to the vaccinations present in the child vaccination calendar, but rejected (31.3%) the flu vaccine, as they had not received it previously and did not want it because of their expectant state. Conclusions: The women positively evaluated the effectiveness and safety of the vaccines. However, with the flu vaccine, "not being previously vaccinated" and the "doubts about its safety" represented more than half of the reasons put forth for its rejection. Ensuring that the flu vaccine is perceived as more effective and acceptable through the messages directed towards the expectant mothers, directly through the midwives or through the communication media and social networks, will result in an increase of vaccine coverage.
DOI: 10.3390/medicina55080467
PubMed: 31405260
PubMed Central: PMC6723429
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Knowledge and Attitudes about the Flu Vaccine among Pregnant Women in the Valencian Community (Spain).</title><author><name sortKey="Rodriguez Blanco, Noelia" sort="Rodriguez Blanco, Noelia" uniqKey="Rodriguez Blanco N" first="Noelia" last="Rodríguez-Blanco">Noelia Rodríguez-Blanco</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Universitario del Vinalopó, Spain C/Tonico Sansano Mora, 14, 03293 Elche, Spain.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Espagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Universitario del Vinalopó, Spain C/Tonico Sansano Mora, 14, 03293 Elche</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region nuts="2" type="communauté">Communauté valencienne</region></placeName></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Nursing Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera. Plaza Reyes Católicos, 19, 03204 Elche, Spain.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Espagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Nursing Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera. Plaza Reyes Católicos, 19, 03204 Elche</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region nuts="2" type="communauté">Communauté valencienne</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tuells, Jose" sort="Tuells, Jose" uniqKey="Tuells J" first="José" last="Tuells">José Tuells</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Cátedra Balmis de Vacunología. University of Alicante. Campus de San Vicente Raspeig. Ap.99, E-03080 Alicante, Spain. tuells@ua.es.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Espagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Cátedra Balmis de Vacunología. University of Alicante. Campus de San Vicente Raspeig. Ap.99, E-03080 Alicante</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region nuts="2" type="communauté">Communauté valencienne</region></placeName></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2019">2019</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:31405260</idno><idno type="pmid">31405260</idno><idno type="doi">10.3390/medicina55080467</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC6723429</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">00008</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">00008</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000008</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000008</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000008</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Knowledge and Attitudes about the Flu Vaccine among Pregnant Women in the Valencian Community (Spain).</title><author><name sortKey="Rodriguez Blanco, Noelia" sort="Rodriguez Blanco, Noelia" uniqKey="Rodriguez Blanco N" first="Noelia" last="Rodríguez-Blanco">Noelia Rodríguez-Blanco</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Universitario del Vinalopó, Spain C/Tonico Sansano Mora, 14, 03293 Elche, Spain.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Espagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Universitario del Vinalopó, Spain C/Tonico Sansano Mora, 14, 03293 Elche</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region nuts="2" type="communauté">Communauté valencienne</region></placeName></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Nursing Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera. Plaza Reyes Católicos, 19, 03204 Elche, Spain.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Espagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Nursing Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera. Plaza Reyes Católicos, 19, 03204 Elche</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region nuts="2" type="communauté">Communauté valencienne</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tuells, Jose" sort="Tuells, Jose" uniqKey="Tuells J" first="José" last="Tuells">José Tuells</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Cátedra Balmis de Vacunología. University of Alicante. Campus de San Vicente Raspeig. Ap.99, E-03080 Alicante, Spain. tuells@ua.es.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Espagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Cátedra Balmis de Vacunología. University of Alicante. Campus de San Vicente Raspeig. Ap.99, E-03080 Alicante</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region nuts="2" type="communauté">Communauté valencienne</region></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)</title><idno type="eISSN">1648-9144</idno><imprint><date when="2019" type="published">2019</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult (MeSH)</term><term>Cross-Sectional Studies (MeSH)</term><term>Female (MeSH)</term><term>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice (MeSH)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Influenza Vaccines (therapeutic use)</term><term>Pregnancy (MeSH)</term><term>Pregnant Women (psychology)</term><term>Prospective Studies (MeSH)</term><term>Spain (MeSH)</term><term>Vaccination (psychology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé (MeSH)</term><term>Espagne (MeSH)</term><term>Femelle (MeSH)</term><term>Femmes enceintes (psychologie)</term><term>Grossesse (MeSH)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Vaccination (psychologie)</term><term>Vaccins antigrippaux (usage thérapeutique)</term><term>Études prospectives (MeSH)</term><term>Études transversales (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="therapeutic use" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza Vaccines</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Spain</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Femmes enceintes</term><term>Vaccination</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Pregnant Women</term><term>Vaccination</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="usage thérapeutique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Vaccins antigrippaux</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Cross-Sectional Studies</term><term>Female</term><term>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</term><term>Humans</term><term>Pregnancy</term><term>Prospective Studies</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé</term><term>Espagne</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Grossesse</term><term>Humains</term><term>Études prospectives</term><term>Études transversales</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Espagne</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><i>Background and Objectives:</i> To describe the knowledge and attitudes related to the acceptance of the flu vaccine during pregnancy in women, from two Health Departments of the Valencian Community (VC), during the 2015-2016 season, after receiving prenatal care. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> A prospective observational study was conducted during the annual vaccine season of women ascribed to prenatal care. A midwife offered flu vaccine advice and afterwards conducted a telephone poll of a representative sample, in order to find out the reason for accepting or rejecting the vaccine. <i>Results:</i> Of the 1017 expectant women who received advice about the vaccine, 77.4% (95% CI: 74.8-79.9%) declared their intention to vaccinate. After the recommendation, the vaccine coverage was 61.6%, with a percentage of accordance of 98.8% (95% CI: 98.0-99.6%) between the coverage declared and the Nominal Vaccination Registry (NVR) of the VC. Additionally, 67.2% of the expectant women were interviewed (<i>n</i> = 683). Most were aware of the recommendation and identified the health center and the midwife as the main sources of information. The internet was a consistent source in favor of vaccination 80.8% (<i>n</i> = 42). The obstetric variables (risk during the pregnancy, end of pregnancy, and feeding the newborn) did not have a statistically significant relationship with the vaccination. The women declared a high adherence to the vaccinations present in the child vaccination calendar, but rejected (31.3%) the flu vaccine, as they had not received it previously and did not want it because of their expectant state. <i>Conclusions:</i> The women positively evaluated the effectiveness and safety of the vaccines. However, with the flu vaccine, "not being previously vaccinated" and the "doubts about its safety" represented more than half of the reasons put forth for its rejection. Ensuring that the flu vaccine is perceived as more effective and acceptable through the messages directed towards the expectant mothers, directly through the midwives or through the communication media and social networks, will result in an increase of vaccine coverage.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">31405260</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2020</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>24</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1648-9144</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>55</Volume><Issue>8</Issue><PubDate><Year>2019</Year><Month>Aug</Month><Day>11</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Medicina (Kaunas)</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Knowledge and Attitudes about the Flu Vaccine among Pregnant Women in the Valencian Community (Spain).</ArticleTitle><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">E467</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3390/medicina55080467</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText><i>Background and Objectives:</i> To describe the knowledge and attitudes related to the acceptance of the flu vaccine during pregnancy in women, from two Health Departments of the Valencian Community (VC), during the 2015-2016 season, after receiving prenatal care. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> A prospective observational study was conducted during the annual vaccine season of women ascribed to prenatal care. A midwife offered flu vaccine advice and afterwards conducted a telephone poll of a representative sample, in order to find out the reason for accepting or rejecting the vaccine. <i>Results:</i> Of the 1017 expectant women who received advice about the vaccine, 77.4% (95% CI: 74.8-79.9%) declared their intention to vaccinate. After the recommendation, the vaccine coverage was 61.6%, with a percentage of accordance of 98.8% (95% CI: 98.0-99.6%) between the coverage declared and the Nominal Vaccination Registry (NVR) of the VC. Additionally, 67.2% of the expectant women were interviewed (<i>n</i> = 683). Most were aware of the recommendation and identified the health center and the midwife as the main sources of information. The internet was a consistent source in favor of vaccination 80.8% (<i>n</i> = 42). The obstetric variables (risk during the pregnancy, end of pregnancy, and feeding the newborn) did not have a statistically significant relationship with the vaccination. The women declared a high adherence to the vaccinations present in the child vaccination calendar, but rejected (31.3%) the flu vaccine, as they had not received it previously and did not want it because of their expectant state. <i>Conclusions:</i> The women positively evaluated the effectiveness and safety of the vaccines. However, with the flu vaccine, "not being previously vaccinated" and the "doubts about its safety" represented more than half of the reasons put forth for its rejection. Ensuring that the flu vaccine is perceived as more effective and acceptable through the messages directed towards the expectant mothers, directly through the midwives or through the communication media and social networks, will result in an increase of vaccine coverage.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Rodríguez-Blanco</LastName><ForeName>Noelia</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-8815-5055</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Universitario del Vinalopó, Spain C/Tonico Sansano Mora, 14, 03293 Elche, Spain.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Nursing Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera. Plaza Reyes Católicos, 19, 03204 Elche, Spain.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Tuells</LastName><ForeName>José</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-1159-429X</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Cátedra Balmis de Vacunología. University of Alicante. Campus de San Vicente Raspeig. Ap.99, E-03080 Alicante, Spain. tuells@ua.es.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D064888">Observational Study</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2019</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>11</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Switzerland</Country><MedlineTA>Medicina (Kaunas)</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9425208</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1010-660X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D007252">Influenza Vaccines</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003430" MajorTopicYN="N">Cross-Sectional Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007722" MajorTopicYN="Y">Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007252" MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza Vaccines</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000627" MajorTopicYN="Y">therapeutic use</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011247" MajorTopicYN="N">Pregnancy</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D037841" MajorTopicYN="N">Pregnant Women</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011446" MajorTopicYN="N">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013030" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Spain</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014611" MajorTopicYN="N">Vaccination</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="N">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">acceptability</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">immunization</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">influenza</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">pregnancy</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">vaccine coverage</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">vaccine hesitancy</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2019</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>28</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2019</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>31</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2019</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>05</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2019</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2019</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2020</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>25</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">31405260</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">medicina55080467</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3390/medicina55080467</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC6723429</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jul;63(2):347-58</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16545514</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;116(4):949-55</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20859160</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Prev Med. 2011 Jan;52(1):75-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21047526</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Matern Child Health J. 2013 Jan;17(1):156-64</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22367067</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2012 May 28;30(25):3771-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22445808</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Public Health (Oxf). 2013 Dec;35(4):570-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23365262</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2014 Apr 1;32(16):1786-92</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24530929</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2014 Apr 17;32(19):2150-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24598724</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>ISRN Prev Med. 2013 Nov 07;2013:879493</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24971194</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2014 Aug 6;32(36):4602-13</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24996123</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 08;14:818</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25103561</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Qual Health Res. 2015 Mar;25(3):360-70</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25246330</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(1):72-82</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25483518</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Rev Esp Quimioter. 2015 Feb;28(1):39-46</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25690144</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2015 Apr 27;33(18):2125-31</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25796339</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Mar 05;15:53</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25880530</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;126(2):333-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26241423</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2015 Oct 26;33(43):5741-5746</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26424607</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Prev Med. 2016 Apr;50(4):480-488</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26526159</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2016 Jan 2;34(1):20-32</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26602267</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Int J Equity Health. 2016 Mar 08;15:45</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26956154</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 29;16:1308</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26965449</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2016 Jul 25;34(34):3942-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27317458</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Prev Med Hyg. 2016;57(1):E13-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27346934</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Dec 09;65(48):1370-1373</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27932781</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2017 Jan 23;35(4):521-528</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28024955</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 9;17(1):48</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28068918</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Jan 20;66(2):56-59</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28103212</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):e0170550</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28125629</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Prev Med. 2017 Jun;99:111-117</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28216380</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017 Apr;77(4):340-351</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28552997</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Mar 4;14(3):758-766</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28708952</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Minerva Ginecol. 2018 Feb;70(1):99-119</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28895680</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2017 Sep 25;35(40):5314-5322</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28917295</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Infect Dis. 2018 Feb 14;217(5):731-741</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29220496</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 11;14(12):</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29232882</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>F1000Res. 2018 Jan 29;7:122</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29445450</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Viral Immunol. 2018 Mar;31(2):184-194</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29474132</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Jul 3;14(7):1599-1609</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29617183</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2018 Jul 12;13(7):e0200333</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30001397</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2018 Aug 8;13(8):e0200934</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30089148</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Sep 28;67(38):1055-1059</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30260946</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nat Med. 2019 Feb;25(2):212-220</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30692696</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 14;16(4):</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30769767</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2019 Mar 22;37(13):1785-1791</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30799158</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Espagne</li></country><region><li>Communauté valencienne</li></region></list><tree><country name="Espagne"><region name="Communauté valencienne"><name sortKey="Rodriguez Blanco, Noelia" sort="Rodriguez Blanco, Noelia" uniqKey="Rodriguez Blanco N" first="Noelia" last="Rodríguez-Blanco">Noelia Rodríguez-Blanco</name></region><name sortKey="Rodriguez Blanco, Noelia" sort="Rodriguez Blanco, Noelia" uniqKey="Rodriguez Blanco N" first="Noelia" last="Rodríguez-Blanco">Noelia Rodríguez-Blanco</name><name sortKey="Tuells, Jose" sort="Tuells, Jose" uniqKey="Tuells J" first="José" last="Tuells">José Tuells</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/GrippeEspagneV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000027 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000027 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= GrippeEspagneV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:31405260
|texte= Knowledge and Attitudes about the Flu Vaccine among Pregnant Women in the Valencian Community (Spain).
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:31405260" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippeEspagneV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |